The underlying themes that run through contemporary art, irrespective of styles and techniques, reveal the complex relationship between art and everyday life worldwide. This revised and expanded edition is brought up to date with discussions on the more comprehensive globalization of art since the mid-1990s, which can be seen in the growth of the exhibition calendar and thThe underlying themes that run through contemporary art, irrespective of styles and techniques, reveal the complex relationship between art and everyday life worldwide. This revised and expanded edition is brought up to date with discussions on the more comprehensive globalization of art since the mid-1990s, which can be seen in the growth of the exhibition calendar and the number of new contemporary art museums opening around the world. With over thirty additional illustrations and an updated timeline and bibliography, this book will prove indispensable to anyone interested in the evolution of modern art....
|Title||:||Art Since 1960|
|Number of Pages||:||256 Pages|
|Status||:||Available For Download|
|Last checked||:||21 Minutes ago!|
Art Since 1960 Reviews
Horrible. Do not read this book if you want any factual information. I have only read the first 100 or so pages and have already found two unforgivable mistakes. Gina Pane, an extremist in body art as here said to be Italian but everybody knows that she was born and raised in France. Pane is coming out of an entirely different cultural and visual tradition. That's like saying Giacometti is Italian solely based on the provenance of the name. In the same chapter he says that Germano Celant coined the term "Arte Povera" in 1969. Actually everybody knows that it was 1967 published in Flash Art along with his exhibition called Arte Povera - Im Spazio. Arte Povera being created after the May protests of 1968 doesn't even make any sense, I can't believe nobody caught that. This book has brought disrepute in my eyes to the whole world of art series.
At first this book was really hard and I didn't want to read it but once I got to the 1980s it became really easy. I think because subconsciously I already knew all this stuff. Finishing the book was an accomplishment to me and now I feel on top of everything.
i've been reading this since 1960, which means it sits on my bookshelf and my cat flips through it while i'm at work. it's a useful overview, though.
Less thematic than I would have liked; often reads as if he has simply ripped off about 40-50 catalogue commentaries on individual artworks in lieu of making any kind of wider argument about general trends or developments. There are perhaps 10 or so such paragraphs spread over 300+ pages - it's an "overview", alright, but hardly a "critical" one - don't trust the blurb. 4 stars anyway because it at least covered a lot of material in a readable style.
What to do about art after the War? Writing about--and studying--the fragmentation and/or proliferation of -isms is a daunting task.
from my favorite art history class at oberlin